Anderson, A.W. "Prendergast Found His Horses,
Returned To Found A City," Jamestown (NY) Post-Journal,
The Post-Journal website:
http://post-journal.com/
Prendergast Found His Horses, Returned To Found A City
By A. W. Anderson
James Prendergast, the man who founded Jamestown and for whom
the town was named, was a son of William Prendergast, who was born in Ireland in
1727, and emigrated to this country before he had reached the age of manhood. He
settled in Pawling, Dutchess County, New York. Here he married Mehitable Wing,
who was born in America of Scotch parents. They afterward moved to Pittstown,
Rensselaer County. Seven sons and six daughters were born to them, all of whom,
excepting one, lived to middle or old age. A large portion of this family, in
1805, left Pittstown in a large caravan to find a new home if possible in the
Eldorado of the west. They settled finally in the Chautauqua region, generally
in the northwest portion, in 1806.
James Prendergast discovered the scene of the city which
would bear his name, not by design but by accident, while looking for a pair of
strayed horses. He returned to Pittstown, married Agnes Thompson, and moved with
his wife and baby to Chautauqua in the fall of 1810.
Accompanying them were John
and Mary Blowers, the young man and wife who were in their employ. They lived
during the succeeding winter in the home of Matthew, a brother of James, who
owned a large farm on the west side of the lake, not far from Mayville. During
the fall of 1810 John Blowers, at the direction of James Prendergast, built a
temporary log house on the bank of the Outlet, not far from the present
steamboat landing. the best information available indicates that the Blowers
lived here during the winter of 1810-11.
In the spring of 1811, James Prendergast constructed a log
house at a point on the bank of the Outlet, not far from the present Steele
Street bridge. He also built a dam at the same point and erected a sawmill there
the same year. His house and mill burned in 1812, and hw rebuilt his mill on the
east side of the present Main Street, south of the Erie Railroad, and moved into
a slab house which he built at a point on what is now the east side of Cherry
Street, half way between First and Second streets.
In 1814, he built a frame house on the lot above the present
National Chautauqua County Bank, and here he resided until 1836, when he moved
to Ripley and thence to his farm on the Kiantone Meadows.
Before the final coming of James Prendergast from Pittstown,
his brother Matthew, at his direction, had bought a thousand acres of the land
on which the city now stands, afterward deeding it to him.
The first store was established in 1813 on the northwest
corner of Main and First streets, by Jediah and Martin Prendergast, brother of
James. That year, also, the first blacksmith shop was established.
The first survey of village lots here was made for James
Prendergast in 1815, by his nephew, Thomas Bemus. Thoams Disher, manager of the
Prendergast store, drew a plain, simple map of the lots surveyed by Bemus. This
was kept at the store and was for many years the only map of the village. The
lots were of uniform size, 50 by 120 feet, and were offered at $50 each.
The site of Jamestown previous to 1815 was called "The
Rapids," due to the swift water of the shallows at this point in the outlet of
Lake Chautauqua. In the summer of that year the village received the name by
which the city is now designated.
The first tavern was built on the east side of Main Street,
half-way between First and Second streets, by Jacob Fenton, a soldier of the
Revolution, in 1814. He also established and operated a small pottery at the
rear of his tavern.
In 1814, the first gristmill was built by James Prendergast,
on the west side of Main Street, south of the line of the present Erie Railroad.
The first tannery was established in 1815 at the foot of Cherry Street about
where the Erie station now stands.
In 1815 three additional taverns were framed and partly
finished. They were: the Allen Tavern, southeast corner of Main and Third
Streets; Ballard Tavern, southwest corner of Main and Third Streets; and what
afterwards became the Jones Tavern and subsequently the Shaw Hotel, on the
northwest corner of Main and Third streets. The Cass Tavern was begun in 1817
and finished in 1819 by Plinny Cass, on the southwest corner of Main and Second
streets.
The first school was taught in a room of the Blowers house (a
building erected by John Blowers for James Prendergast in 1813 on the west side
of Main Street, halfway between First and Second streets) in 1814. In
1816, the first school building, Prendergast Academy, was erected on the west
side of Main Street, near Fifth Street. The second school building was erected
in 1822 on the northeast corner of Fourth and Pine.
In 1815 two physicians settled here: Dr. Elial T. Foote in
the spring, and Dr. Laban Hazeltine in the summer.
In 1814, the first wool-carding industry was established here
by Walter Simmons and Horace Blanchar on the second floor of the Prendergast
gristmill. This year also the first bridge over the Outlet was constructed by
Reuben Landon.
In 1816, a post office was established here and a mail route
passed through the village; the first church (Congregational) was organized; the
first lawyer, Samuel A. Brown, settled here; a hat shop was established.
A small amount of furniture was made here by various persons
beginning as early as 1814. In 1816, Royal Keyes built a carpenter shop on the
west side of Main Street near Fourth Street. From this time forward he made - in
his spare time form his regular employment as house-builder - an increasing
amount of cabinet work. In 1820 William Breed came to the village and entered
the business with Keyes. In 1825 the first furniture factory was built by Breed
Brothers on the west side of Pine Street, between Third and Fourth Streets, and
in remodeled form, is still standing there. Chair-making was begun by Phineas
Palmiter in 1827. He was Jamestown's first furniture-maker, beginning in a small
way as early as 1814.
In 1826, the first newspaper, the Jamestown Journal,
was established in a building erected for the purpose on the northeast corner of
Main and Fourth Streets, by the publisher, Adolphus Fletcher.
In 1827, the village was incorporated.
The first drug store was established in 1829 by Dr. E. T.
Foote, in a long, one-story building which he erected that year on the east side
of Main Street about 50 feet above Second Street.
The first steamboat plying between Mayville and Jamestown was
launched here in 1828.
In 1829, the first fire department was organized.
The Methodist Episcopal Church was organized here in 1823,
the Baptist Church in 1826, and the Presbyterian Church in 1833.
The National Chautauqua County Bank was organized in 1831,
and a one-story bank building, 18 by 34, was erected on the northwest side of
the lot now occupied by that bank.
In 1849 the first Swedish settler arrived.
In 1852, a fire destroyed the buildings on the east side of
Main Street.
( Originally printed in the 1927 Village of Jamestown Centennial
Program, and reprinted in the Post-Journal)
How Jamestown Changed From A Village To A
City: From Writing The Charter To Approval From Albany
By Mark Genovese
The 56-year-old village of
Jamestown had been growing rapidly by 1883, and many of the residents felt that
the government under a village charter was no longer able to carry out all of
the activities necessary to handle its growth.
With a population that would be reported to be at least 14,000 by
1886, Jamestown was the corporate entity with the largest population in
Chautauqua County. A feeling that change was necessary had been agitating the
community for some time.
On Nov. 20, 1883, an editorial titled "Village or City?" in the
Jamestown Evening Journal voiced the question that some people had been
asking about whether the village would be better served by a revision in its
current charter.
It said: "The most careful canvass of opinion seems to indicate
that the sentiment in favor of a city charter is not strong enough to make an
attempt for its adoption at this time advisable, while among the members of the
community the preponderance of opinion is against it," it said.
"There are improvements such as sewers that should no longer be
delayed. But these improvements could be made by way of making amendments to the
village charter," the editorial continued.
"Not a large portion of the community favor the project of a city
charter and those who do want it are anxious that it should be of the most
limited kind," it said, adding, "The majority is not always right, but in this
case we are inclined to believe that the course of wisdom is not to push the
city charter scheme any farther at present."
Several prominent citizens of the community were asked for their
opinion.
Reuben E. Fenton, former governor, said, "The subjects or matters
of village interest are becoming so numerous and weighty that I am inclined to
think we cannot properly postpone a city charter with increased power and
authority for very much longer; at our present rate of growth I should say not
more than a year or so at the farthest."
Oscar F. Price, a former president of the village board and state
legislator, said it was only a matter of time before a city charter must be
adopted but he did not believe the year for change had arrived.
Renewed Interest
The paper reported on Monday,
Feb. 4, 1884, "The matter is exciting considerable interest and it is possible
that if a move was rightly made those then opposed to any innovation might be
led to look at the matter in a different light."
To the people of Jamestown at the time "city" was a word that meant
heavy taxes and unlimited corruption. "It is urged and can perhaps be shown that
such fears may be groundless," the paper said.
In citing the arguments for a new charter, it said, "The old
charter is defective in almost every particular, and the time must soon be if it
is not now at hand, when amendment will be an absolute necessity."
It cited the need for additional representation in the area on the
Chautauqua County Board of Supervisors, pointing out that the town of Kiantone
with 500 inhabitants had the same power as the town of Ellicott with its 16,000
inhabitants.
"The growing commercial and business interests of the latter town
excite the hostile attention of other portions of the county and it is only
ordinary business policy that we should place a ourselves in a position of
defense," it said.
Some area leaders felt that the present village charter could
be easily amended by replacing the word "city" in place of "village," and by
inserting a clause providing for six wards or election districts, each to elect
its own supervisor, with a supervisor at large for the whole town.
A mayor and two trustees or aldermen per ward would be elected. The
only paid officer would be the city clerk. It was suggested the change could be
made that winter and then brought before the state legislature.
Other groups felt the village charter should be overhauled
thoroughly, which would take more time, but they felt it would be the wiser
choice.
A citizen's committee met on Monday, Feb. 11, and appointed a group
of 10 village citizens to look into the matter, with Alex M. Lowry, village
board president, elected chairman.
After about a week of study Clark R. Lockwood, chairman of the
attorney's sub-committee, said at a meeting on Thursday, Feb. 14, there was no
legal objection to changing the present charter, but that the village would also
have to sever ties with the town of Ellicott.
The group decided the mayor and council should serve without pay,
not because their services would be unworthy of compensation, but because in
making the change from a village to a city it was advisable to avoid everything
that would place additional tax burdens upon the citizens and arouse prejudice
against the movement.
Lockwood joined James I. Fowler, Jerome B. Fisher and Willis O.
Benedict on another committee to draw up the document.
The revised charter was presented at a meeting on Thursday, Feb.
28.
The paper said the next day: "Between an hour and a half to two
hours was occupied in the reading, so voluminous was the report. At various
points in the paper Mr. Lockwood made explanations and his words were so
carefully uttered that the listeners easily comprehended what he read. No
serious fault was found in the document."
In publishing the charter in the Saturday, March 1, 1884,
Evening Journal, the paper noted some people in the community were beginning
to feel the time to draft it was short and the time for the community to
consider it was even shorter.
Those against the charter said the document was imperfect in regard
to "poor matters," the police and fire departments, "sewerage" and powers of the
mayoral and council.
However the next day village residents approved by a vote of
608-588 a proposition for the village to have a city charter.
After the referendum, committee members said the questionable
points must be rectified before the charter is submitted to Albany, "or the
flaws will be made an excuse for refusing to grant the petition."
An area lawyer, who was not identified, had said that city charters
made up in a hurry were worse than no charters at all, and less desirable than a
village charter. The paper noted that Lockport, which charted as a city in 1865,
had to make revisions in its charter almost yearly.
Residents Demand Action
The Jamestown city charter movement
was idle until January 1885, when the interest reportedly began stirring again.
Enthusiasm was whipped up in part by items appearing in the Evening Journal
editorial column, such as a statement on Jan. 5: "Jamestown Wants: More Pure
Water, Free Postal Delivery, A New Charter;" or one on Jan. 16, "Isn't it time
for Jamestown to be moving again in the matter of a new charter?" The editorial
noted that Lockport and Dunkirk were revising theirs.
On Monday, Jan. 26, the village board decided to consult the
citizens of Jamestown in regard to securing a city charter. The paper decided to
rouse more spirit two days later by printing the names of the men who attended
the first charter committee meeting the year before.
Many of these same names were on a petition presented to the
village board on Monday, Feb. 23, 1885. Sixty residents and representatives from
businesses signed the petition asking the trustees to call a general meeting of
the citizens to consider drafting and adopting a charter.
At that meeting, Porter Sheldon and John J. Whitney were appointed
to talk with authorities from Dunkirk about their city charter on Wednesday,
Feb. 25. Dunkirk had incorporated six years earlier.
Reporting on their meeting to the village trustees on Thursday,
Feb. 26, and to the citizens' committee on Friday, Feb. 27, the group said the
Dunkirk charter could be applicable to Jamestown with a few changes.
Three people - Robert N. Marvin, Almet N. Broadhead, and Frank E.
Gifford - were appointed to select seven more members for a committee to draw up
a new charter. On Monday, March 2, they picked: Sheldon Whitney, John T. Wilson,
Orsino E. Jones, James L. Fowler, Jerome Preston, and Oscar Price. Marvin, the
chairman, said it was again decided no hasty action should be taken in drawing
up this charter.
By Saturday, May 2, the committee announced it was impossible for
the commission to perfect the charter in time to have it introduced in the state
Legislature that session. The committee promised to work through the summer and
early autumn to produce a charter that would be relatively free from defects.
1886: A City Charter
On Jan. 29, 1886, the charter was
ready for public scrutiny. "There is a desire of the people to learn more about
the draft and there will be a great deal of complaint if it is not made public,"
an editorial said that day.
The paper noted that it might be that in some slight particulars
the charter would not meet the ideas of everyone. "But we do not think that any
trivial fault should stand in the way of its adoption." If after passage by the
legislature and a trial of its provisions, "it is found in any way deficient,
any reasonable amendment can easily be obtained," the paper said.
Attendance was reported to be about 300 at a meeting on Wednesday,
Feb. 3. "So many citizens gathered in the Board of Trade Rooms it was deemed
advisable to adjourn to the Prendergast Hall," the paper said.
Marvin noted that the committee gathered copies of other city
charters and considered the effect of the proposed laws on the community. For
the past few weeks the committee had met nearly every weekend evening, he
pointed out.
The speaker said the committee did not assume "that perfection had
been reached in the instrument, but stated that the best judgment and labors of
the committee had been exercised in the preparation thereof.
"We have done the best we could under all circumstances," said
Marvin, "and now present to you, the citizens, to do with it as you deem
proper."
The paper said: "There was a debate of considerable length, a
portion of the speakers favoring nearly immediate action and others wishing to
delay the adoption of the charter for two or three weeks."
The citizens' committee agreed to publish the charter an to call a
public meeting at its discretion.
The Evening Journal published the text of the charter on
Saturday, Feb. 6. "The general sentiment to the charter had been very
favorable. Nearly the only provision that is subjected to almost unanimous
criticism is the one in relation to supervisors," it reported on Monday, Feb. 8.
"By providing five supervisors in the city, one will be returned
from the town, making six in all. Many felt that not only are six supervisors
not needed, but the instrument is likely to be rejected in Albany if submitted
with that number," the paper said.
It added that two or three would be sufficient, and "would not
create additional expense for taxpayers or alienate the good feeling toward
Jamestown by the rest of the county."
Another criticism that arose during the next two weeks was that the
Common Council was not given enough power to pave streets and build sewers.
These people feared the work would not be done if the decision could be made
only on a vote by the people affected, as specified in the charter.
Farmlands, if not divided for development, were to be taxed
lightly. But if a house should be built, it would be placed on a higher tax
schedule. This discriminates against the poor, the paper said.
Some people in the community also disagreed with the provision that
the city collect taxes for the school district. According to state law at the
time, issuing a tax warrant is the duty of the city when the boundary lines of
the city and school district are the same. But in Jamestown the boundaries were
different, which made collection the duty of school officials.
Leaving the provision as it stood in the draft - in conflict with
state law - could impede the charter's passage, critics warned.
Another disputed item was an amendment requiring a petition for
paving a section of a street be signed by owners of two-thirds of the lineal
feet along the street before the council could act on the matter.
"The interests of the people were well-guarded before and the
amendment proposed amounts to so much of an obstruction that in the opinion of
many it will be impossible to secure the very improvements for which the charter
was principally framed," the paper said in an editorial.
In addition, the paper said, "Instead of restricting the powers of
council on sewerage, these powers should be extended by the committee."
An amendment suggested that the Jamestown charter allow women who
are also taxpayers the opportunity to vote.
"This involves a very radical change in municipal matters and upon
the basis of moral right and equity there is no such thing as an argument
against it," the paper said in endorsing the proposal.
This amendment, introduced by F. W. Stevens, was passed unanimously
at a second charter meeting on Friday, Feb. 12. Women paid about a quarter of
the taxes, yet none had a voice in selecting officers, he said, although women
taxpayers were as well able to transact business as the men.
The committee also amended the charter to allow the school district
to execute its own tax warrants.
"It really seems as if there had been about enough discussion over
this matter," the Wednesday, Feb. 17, Jamestown Evening Journal said,
"Let it be closed up tonight. If Jamestown is to be changed from a village to a
city during the present legislature, the proposed charter must go at once to
Albany."
At the final charter session that evening the mood of the citizens'
committee was reported to be more cooperative, but its members rescinded the
amendment giving voting rights to female taxpayers.
The committee reasoned that the amendment might conflict with the
state constitution and would hamper the passage of the charter through the
legislature.
The only other change called for a petition by a majority of the
property owners representing more than half the linear feet on a street in order
to have a street paved.
This would help protect the rights of those of moderate means, "who
might otherwise be coerced by the will of their more extensive land-owning
neighbors," the paper said.
The charter was sent to Albany on Monday, March 8, accompanied by a
committee of local citizens.
Area residents had another interest in Albany that week: They were
opposed to a bill in the Senate which would prevent the building of a railroad
on lands owned by the Point Chautauqua Association. This railroad would help the
area become a summer resort, they said.
Jamestown's city charter was introduced to the state Legislature on
Tuesday, March 8, by Assemblyman Newell Cheney of the town of Poland. It was
referred to the Committee on Cities, which gave Price a hearing that afternoon.
Assembly approval was given on Friday, March 19. Eleven days later
it was approved in the senate and was sent to Gov. David B. Hill for his
signature.
On Thursday, April 1, 1886, the paper said simply: About six
o'clock Wednesday evening the following dispatch was received at this office:
´ALBANY, March 31 - Railroad bill killed. City charter signed by Governor this
afternoon. - Jones, Gifford and Wilson.`
Consequently Jamestown is a city."
A City Government
"The news the governor had signed
the bill spread around town last evening but created hardly a ripple of interest
as no other result was expected. Today the word 'city' is spoken probably
infrequently as any," an editorial read the next day.
As according to the charter, the Jamestown Village Board was to
publish a notice of city election.
To be filled were the offices of mayor, treasurer, clerk, overseer
of the poor, police justice, four justices of the peace, three assessors, three
commissioners of excise, a sealer of weights and measures, four constables, and
a game constable.
Also to be elected were two more supervisors from the city, and two
aldermen and two inspectors of election from each ward.
Jamestown city officials were to appoint an attorney, civil
engineer, street commissioner, fire warden, poundmaster, chief of police and not
more than six policemen.
The Evening Journal supported Robert Marvin to be the city's
first mayor, citing his executive ability and his familiarity with the charter.
Marvin did not run for the office, making the two eventual candidates Price and
Noah W. Gokey. Gokey was considered the labor man's candidate.
The first Jamestown city election was to be held on Tuesday, April
13, and candidates were reported to be "hourly multiplying." Caucuses were held
Friday, April 9, for each of the wards and a general caucus was held Saturday,
April 10, to nominate candidates for the citywide offices.
The majority of candidates turned out to be Republican, which upset
the community's Democrats. The party threatened to nominate their own slate of
candidates.
"It was proposed to keep politics out of the first city elections
in Jamestown and politics now is the most conspicuous thing about it," the paper
said in an editorial.
It added: "It is safe to say that in the attendance of electors, in
the interest manifested and in the excitement attending it no parallel case is
known in the history of Jamestown. The remark was frequently heard Saturday, "If
this is a caucus, what will the election be?"
After much consideration, the Democrats decided not to put up a
slate, stating in a bitter letter to the paper they were satisfied the city was
to be Republican and only Republicans were to have the offices. In the best
interests of the city they were not asking for any of the offices, they said.
They acknowleged they were the minority and could not expect any.
Marvin and Price declared he could not disregard the wish of his
friends that he remain a candidate, "and the matter of my candidacy was
thereupon dropped."
Nevertheless, Marvin tallied two votes in that day's election,
according to the totals published in the Evening Journal the next day.
Price was elected the first mayor of the city of Jamestown, defeating Gokey
1,780 to 2. Cyrenus Clark also received votes and 11 were listed as "scattered."
Fred R. Peterson was elected city clerk; Henry Rappole, treasurer;
and Henry J. Yates, police justice.
John G. Wicks and Adam Ports were elected aldermen in the 1st ward;
William T. Bradshaw and Theodore E. Grandin, 2nd ward; Charles F. Hedman and
James S. Ellis, 3rd ward; Conrad A. Hult and Elial F. Carpenter, 4th ward;
Edward R. Bootey and Hiram S. Hall, 5th ward.
A group of about 300 people was reported to have gone to Price's
house at Main and West Sixth streets at about 10 o'clock that night to
congratulate and serenade the new mayor. Barrels and boxes, gathered by local
boys, were set on fire as the crowd cheered and called for speeches by Price and
the newly elected aldermen.
Although its government's officers were elected, the task of
forming a city was not complete. Later that month Gov. Hill would sign a bill
creating a new town of Ellicott out of the parts of the town not included in the
Jamestown incorporation.
On Monday, April 12, the Village Board drew up a statement of
indebtedness for the new City Council and changed its five wards to conform with
the city charter. It then adjourned until Monday, April 19, when it would
reconvene to adjourn without a day to meet again and hand its business over to
the Jamestown Common Council.
What Happened At The First City Council Meeting
By Mark Genovese
On Monday, April 19, 1886, Jamestown looked back
upon its 59-year history as a village stepped into the future - as a city.
With pride its new officials - sworn in for only a matter of
minutes - spoke that night of what would be required of them in the years to
come, at the very first meeting of the Jamestown Common Council.
The tiny headline on page 4 of the Tuesday, April 20, 1886,
Jamestown Evening Journal read: "Council Proceedings. The Village Trustees
Meet, Canvass the vote and Adjourn Without Day- The City Council Organized and
the Proceedings."
At 7 p.m. Village Board President John Cadwell called the village
trustees to order in the board of trade rooms. Trustees of the last village
board were: Charles F. Hedman, Peter H. Hoyt, Hiram Smith, Conrad A. Hult, John
G. Lonngren, and Clinton B. Winsor. John Cadwell was president.
The board canvassed the vote cast at the city election April 13.
Elected to office were: Oscar F. Price, mayor; and aldermen John G. Wicks, Adam
Ports, Theodore E. Grandin, William T. Bradshaw, Charles F. Hedman, James S.
Ellis, Elial F. Carpenter, Conrad A. Hult, Edward R. Bootey, and Hiram S. Hall.
Smith took the floor and gave a 10-minute talk on the early history
of Jamestown.
"Mr. President and Gentlemen:- The events transpiring are entitled
to more than a passing observance. Few of us realize that the old village
corporation has had an existence of nearly 60 years."
Smith said that "The first tax sought to be raised by the village
was for $300 but it was voted down. However, the inhabitants contributed enough
hands to build the reservoir for fire purposes at the corner of Main and Third
Streets. The following year a tax of $150 was voted and with it fire
engines and other apparatus were purchased."
In 1829 a tax of $45 was used to build an engine house and purchase
fire ladders and for several years later the regular tax was $200.
"I urge upon the new government the necessity of avoiding excessive
taxation. I know it will drive capital form the city and retard our prosperity,"
he said.
Smith added, "It is easy to be liberal with other people's money as
we all know, but my judgment is that the true legislator will expend the
people's money with the same care and prudence as if it were his own."
He said that a 1828 census showed there were 311 males and 233
females for a total of 544 citizens. He urged a new census be taken "as the
figures will be valuable as a basis for reference in future years."
He added that even as far back as 1835 Ellicott was the
sixth-largest town in the county in population, being exceeded by Hanover,
Pomfret, Westfield, Harmony and even Ellery. "Yet no town in the country has
grown so rapidly in population, wealth, enterprise and importance as the town of
Jamestown, which is largely due to the men who have urged thrift, economy, and
enterprise and kept the place free from a heavy debt," he said.
"I am one who cheerfully surrenders to the new administration the
affairs of the village. I believe they are capable men. I hope you, the
aldermen, will so guard the public interests as to satisfy yourselves and your
constituents, and that the verdict shall be at the close of your service, ´well
done good and faithful servants.`"
Cadwell thanked Smith and read an extract from the City Charter on
the transfer of control of the municipal affairs from the old to the new
government.
According to Section 9 of the city charter, "All offices of the
village of Jamestown, the terms of all such village officers, and the powers,
authority and jurisdiction in or over said village and city of all officers of
the town of Ellicott shall thereupon cease."
Clerk Fred R. Peterson read the returns of the city election,
naming those elected to office.
Cadwell said, "In accordance with the provisions of the new charter
I now declare the gentlemen whose names were just read duly elected. With the
action the authority of the board of village trustees of Jamestown ceases."
Smith moved to adjourn the board sine die (without a day to meet
again). The motion was carried, and the village board came to an end.
President Cadwell then stepped back from the desk and addressed the
mayor. "His voice was some what broken with the depth of his sentiment, and at
the close of his brief address, which was intently listened to, there was
applause from all parts of the room."
He said to Price, "You are here today the proud representative of
the new - we are the no less proud representatives of the old. You look forward
with hope to the future - we look back with pride upon the past. You look upon
the child born today - we upon one born nearly 60 years ago, now grown gray and
very near the end of life."
He added, "But what of the future city? Will her record equal that
of the village of the past? Will she be a Pearl City in fact as well as in name,
with all the name suggests to us - not a brilliant lustre that may be quickly
dimmed and tarnished by bad laws, badly administered, but instead like the
mother of pearl, gathering to herself all that is best of wise legislation,
honestly administered, shining with a pure undimmed light?"
He said "We believe it will be so, that your honorable body will
sink all personal and partisan feeling and do that which is wisest and best for
us all, that 60 years hence there will be citizens who will look back upon those
years with as much pride as we do upon these now so nearly ended. And now sir,
we of the old lay our burdens upon your shoulders, of the new, and, doing so
with heartfelt sincerity, wish you God speed and all honor and prosperity to the
city of Jamestown."
Special County Judge Marvin Smith administered the path of office
to Mayor Price then to Clerk Peterson and finally to the 10 aldermen.
In his address to the Common Council, Price said, "It is
particularly fit that at the outset of our new government we, who are but the
agents of the people should understand each other."
He said, "The management of local affairs belongs to the people
concerned because they best understand and are most competent to control them."
Price continued, "A city of 15,000 cannot be operated with the
legislative restrictions imposed upon a village upon of a thousand or two. It
therefore became advisable that our form of government should be changed."
He said the Common Council commenced upon the control of the
affairs of this city with no money on hand and with no means of raising any but
by the usual spring tax levy. Their city's debt was about $11,843, made up of
$7,080 in time orders not yet due, interest to date of $247, mortgages on city
property of $2,509, a gas bill to date of $887 and current bills unpaid of
$1,180. Charges for water were not due yet.
Price said the amount they could raise was restricted by the
charter. The city could only raise $15,000 in taxes. Of this, $10,000 must be
used only for street purposes, and $5,000 for the erection and repair of
bridges. In addition, the city could only raise an amount to meet its
obligations to the water company.
He said the city would probably need for general purposes no less
than $12,500 and possibly $15,000.
Price cited the bridge at Harrison Street and another at the
boatlanding as needing repair "of no great outlay." He said, "It must be
conceded that the streets of the city of Jamestown, situated as we are among so
many hills, are more than ordinarily hard to keep in repair and exceedingly
difficult to put in grade."
Because of the city's tight finances, heavy grading should not be
done, nor any extensive improvements, he recommended.
However, he said the city should keep its streets in good repair
and "relieve the traveler of the annoyance of stones in the road."
Price said, "Time will soon come when we will be called upon to
pave a portion of our business streets." He said it would be a great improvement
to pave from the railroad to Fourth Street on Main Street, Second and Third
Streets from Cherry to Pine streets, "but we should not at present undertake
it."
He added that new and repaved sidewalks were needed. The village
had defended itself in several suits for "damage occasioned by defective
footways."
"We have ample power to prevent the accumulation of weeds in the
streets and to keep them clear of rubbish of all kinds," he said. "We should
insist that other dumping grounds than the public highways should be found," he
said. Price also added that aldermen should not seek an unfair amount of work
for their wards.
His feelings about sewers were the same as those about paving. "As
to such sewers as have been and will be introduced by private enterprise, we
should cooperate with the owners in giving free passage through the streets and
alleys and in providing outlets therefore."
Price noted the charter requires a council room to be provided as
well as a courtroom, and treasurer and justice offices. "Neither expensive nor
elaborate quarters are intended nor required," he said, noting the city owns a
building at the corner of Spring and Third streets that "perhaps with moderate
expense can be utilized for some of these requirements."
The first mayor of the city also encouraged spending on the Fire
Department to be liberal as it can, in justice to other interests.
He added the city should also compel the railroads to keep a
flagman or gates or both at street crossings, and compel them to bridge or
tunnel every street.
After Price's speech, Bradshaw offered a resolution to form a
committee on organization. Aldermen Wicks, Hall and Carpenter were to serve on
it.
Members also approved the purchase of a seal to read "City of
Jamestown 1886."
The alderman also determined that it was necessary to name a street
commissioner at once. Alderman Bootey named R. J. Forbes as an applicant.
Wicks named Horace Walker, Harry Winsor, and Joseph Cowdrey. Hedman
named Charles Parker and William Wilson. Bradshaw named J. D. Berry and Will
Davis. The clerk reported the application of W. T. Denslow.
After the first informal ballot, Forbes and Parker led with three
votes apiece.
A second ballot saw Forbes win with five votes, a third had Forbes
and Parker tied with four votes, a fourth ballot was won by Forbes with 4 votes,
Parker won the fifth ballot with 5, Forbes had 6 on the sixth ballot. Parker
only got 3 on the last vote.
Election of Murray for a chief of police was faster with a 7-2-1
count. The Morning News won the right to be the official newspaper by a
7-3 vote, and Henry J. Yates was approved as the police justice.
The next day an editorial about the historic first Common Council
session said: "The village boards of Jamestown have generally been
composed of prominent citizens of good character who have taken excellent care
of the people's interests and had the board just retired long enough in office
it would probably have demonstrated that it was no exception to the general
rule.
"Jamestown has been remarkably free from jobbery, and as we look
back over the records of the past, we hold the hope that the future will be
equally free from corruption."
Why Did The Swedes Stay On In Jamestown?
Dec. 8, 1938 - The question, "Why did they stay
here?" has been asked many times concerning the early Swedish pioneers who came
here in the early 1850s. While there were larger and more comfortable places in
which they could have settled, it was better said than done.
Need knows no law. Many would have moved on if it had been at all
possible. Their only assets were their families and many children.
Jamestown was, at that time, isolated. There were no good roads, no
railroad until 1864, nor was there any navigation. The inland lake with its
abundance of fish provided sustenence. Surrounding woods provided all sorts of
game, much of which could be trapped and killed to use as further nourishment,
pelts for furs and bird feathers for pillows and mattresses.
In my case, I believe the reason for our coming was because my
mother had several cousins residing here. The youngsters spoke English and the
older folk sort of pecked their way along. As newcomers, we observed that they
had become full-blooded Americans who were also well-dressed.
Today I particularly wish to relate about the post office in 1869.
Looking back now, its like a raindrop in the ocean in the space of time; it was
70 years ago. The post office was located on the west side of Main Street,
between Second and Third streets. The unhurried personnel consisted of the
postmaster and a young clerk. Much of the frustration at the post office was
caused by unstamped letters from Sweden, the postage of which had to be paid by
the addressee. All the Andersons, Johnsons and Petersons had difficulty in
procuring their own mail.
The post office at that time was heated by a woodburning stove.
Whenever a load of wood was delivered and left outside the post office, it had
to be chopped and carried inside. When the need is greatest, help seems to be
nearby. Anders Andersson, who was usually seen with an axe under his arm,
walking around the city trying to be of help to others, was hired for this task.
One day, when Anders had finished his task, the postmaster called
him inside to inquire if he could identify the addressee on a postage-due
envelope. He could, and he volunteered to deliver and collect the postage due.
When Anders learned there were many other postage-due letters in
the post office, he asked to look at them. Seeming to recognize these
addressees, he volunteered to deliver all of them. Known as Swede Andrew to all
of the Americans, he became known as Brev (Letter) Anders to the Swedes - a man
respected for both his appearance and character.
´Gamla Minnen`: Memories Of Old Jamestown
EDITOR'S NOTE: These selections form Claus Nelson's column "Gamla Minnen" (Old Memories) have been translated and condensed by Gerald Heglund.
Brooklyn Square
Aug. 8, 1940 - I remember well what Brooklyn Square
was like in 1869. All that one found was an old wooden building called the
George piano factory. Since there was so little activity there, it became sort
of a market place where farmers could come in with their wagon loads and stay as
long as they liked, unhindered. It was suitable for political meetings as well.
Improvements began in the 1870s by the Weeks brothers who first
built a two-story dwelling on the west side of the square (Hemlock Row), a very
simple and inexpensive building. This was followed by the impressive Weeks
House, which had to give way to the times, being torn down to be replaced by a
gas station.
It seemed as everything had to give way for the gasoline
stations. What the future holds for them, I know not, nor does anyone else.
While no Swedes were located in Brooklyn Square in 1869, not too
many years later one noted all kinds of businesses and factories in which Swedes
were involved.
Noting an event of C. A. Jones in Kantakee, Ill., I recall this
intimate friend as one of the most popular and recognized Swedes here in town.
There are many with the name of Jones here in town, and so he was called
Klockare (Sexton) Jones. Everyone recognized him then. He was the first sexton
at Immanuel Lutheran Church and remained there for several years in that
capacity.
He also had a brother, John Jones, and they together with F. I.
Wallin, another very popular man in Swedish circles, undertook a grocery
business venture known as Jones Bro. and Wallin They became the first, largest
grocery store which was housed in the former George Factory. The new owners were
well-known and liked in the community and everyone wished them well.
All would have gone well, except for one thing - they had no
capital and had to buy on credit, paying for their purchases from items sold in
the store. Unfortunately, many wanted to buy on credit, and never fulfilled
their obligation, so, in time, the business was dissolved. That was the plight
of many others also. It was a large and worthwhile endeavor as long as it
lasted. But now it remains only a memory - this large grocery business in
Brooklyn Square.
F. I. Wallin later traveled to Nebraska and John Jones had a
business at 116 Second St. Both are now gone.
C. A. Jones, who will always be remembered as Klockare (Sexton)
Jones, traveled to Kankakee, 50 miles south of Chicago. To prophecy about these
highly respected and popular men is something I am unable to do fairly. Mr. M.
R. Nelson, who is distantly related to Klockare Jones, is better able to do this
than am I.
Third Street
Feb. 24, 1938 - I have often mentioned how things
were on Third Street, west of Main. Thinking particularly about 1869, this area
was like a driveway and not a very good one at that. The stretched-out land did
not seem promising for any businesses and there was possibly a ramshackle hut
there with someone seeming to reside therein.
Around 1870 and into the '80s, there was an influx of Swedes and
Englishmen who came to settle - consequently a sudden increase in population.
It might be of interest to talk about the hotel business of that
period. Jamestown House was the largest, finest, and best hotel in the city,
located at Main and Second. Next in order of size and popularity was Gifford
House, standing at Main and Third where now stands the First National Bank.
On Second Street was Monitor House which stood just about where M.
R. Nelson's store is now located. Further over on Second Street at Prendergast
was located the first and largest hotel in the city - Locks Tavern, which
changed names so often I can't recall them. A good many of these old hotels are
still standing and are a part of the Nordic Temple building.
This hotel or tavern was the most distinguished in the city at the
time the railroad (The Atlantic and Great Western), was built and finished in
1864. The R. R. station was built on First Street, and immediately opposite it,
was built a fine, large hotel, The Atlantic Hotel, which remains today. Later in
this same period, Weeks house was built in Brooklyn Square by the Weeks
Brothers. It later became known as Humphrey House. Certainly there were enough
hotels here at the time, but they were small and very dated.
A. M. Sherman, manager of Jamestown House, was one of the persons
sensing the need for better hotels. He built the lovely, large, purposeful hotel
known as Sherman House. It seemed that the location, at first, was undesirable
for such an elegant hotel, but it soon enjoyed a very large patronage.
During the 1880s came a family from Smaland which could boast of
tall, strong, young men who became particularly well-known for their business
acumen. Since space limits all that could be said about them, I shall name only
Frank O. Anderson. Jamestown had many Andersons, but none like he.
I remember him well. He was a large, stately man who sometimes
visited C. F. Wahlgren's shoe shop, since in there was always someone with whom
he could visit. Anderson soon came in contact with Charles E. Norquist who owned
a carpenter's shop. If I remember correctly, he married a daughter of Norquist's.
Endowed with the faculty of capacity for organizational ability, he
took the initiative for many enterprises which are truly too numerous to
mention. With one exception. The Hotel Jamestown. He became the leading figure
in undertaking this herculean task.
Responsible for many successful enterprises, there were those who
now thought he was throwing water on his head. In reply to those with negative
attitudes, he declared that it would go, it had to go, and it did. The next
question concerned a suitable place, centrally located, to be obtained at a
reasonable price to erect such a large hotel.
There was the northwest corner of Third and Cherry streets whereone
stood the Presbyterian Church, located next to the large department store of
Abrahamson and Bigelow. Diagonally across the street was the Sherman House later
to be called Hotel Samuels. This property was purchased and the church torn down
since this seemed no longer advantageous to the church.
Called the father of this remarkable enterprise, much could be
written about Frank O. Anderson's abilities as a business genius and activities
leader in this area, but I just wanted to mention what a young man form Smaland
with an unwavering determination and numerous abilities can do in attaining
goals. That's Frank O. Anderson. Long may he live is my wish.
Axel F. Johnson
Feb. 16, 1939 - My dear, old childhood friend from
Vimmerby, Axel F. Johnson, is one whom I wish to write about today. Two
years older than I, he was not among the early pioneers of Jamestown. While he
may be almost forgotten, he was, during his years of pharmacy, well-known. Soon
after his arrival he was hired by a local druggist and soon thereafter opened
his own drug store in the new Opera House building known now as Shea's Theater.
Axel Johnson became the city's first Swedish pharmacist and a very
capable one. After some time in the Opera House he moved to Main and First
streets, where he remained for several years until the owners decided to
establish a bank at that location. Axel, at that point, stated he needed to find
a place where he could be left alone and not have to move whenever a new moon
appeared. He said that it was too costly and troublesome. He then moved to Pine
Street at Second, where he remained until his lack of strength necessitated his
closing his pharmacy.
It would appear that a pharmacist with all of his experience and
studies in medicine would live out his life to become an old man. Not so. I know
of many who would fall into this category and I can list them all if so desired.
To answer the question why I would choose to tell about Axel F.
Johnson, who is mostly forgotten: I do so to recall some of his good fortune.
One of them pertains to his daughter, Victoria, who married a man she had met
while visiting an aunt in Cleveland. He was a Mr. Winch. To them were born twin
sons, Allan and Lester, who became known for thier oratorical and debating
abilities as seniors at East High School. They resembled their grandfather
greatly, who was also an excellent speaker and quick at repartee.
How do I known so much about the daughter? Well, when Axel built
his home at Cherry Street at Eighth Street, I painted and decorated the house,
with intermittent work needed in following months and years. Often the children,
including Victoria, ran across my path.
Translation and condensation of Claus Nelson's column "Gamla
Minnen" (Old Memories) By Gerald Heglund
|
Local Information at Your
Click! |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
For Research Questions please refer to http://www.prendergastlibrary.org/askquestion.html |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Local Information at Your Click! is
supported by Federal Library Services and Technology Act funds, |
||||
04/27/2004